Although the wiki concept encourages everyone to offer contributions, it's understood that very few people are as clever as the editors.All Wikipedia editors ask themselves the following questions when deciding whether or not to revert the edits: If unable to answer positively to all of these questions, edits must be reverted, with smug comments posted on the talk page of the offending user.If an editor is unable to find enough appropriate images he is required to create enough to fill the quota or his article will be deleted.Wikipedia's success in producing accurate and informative articles is largely due to its review process.Also, if an editor dislikes another editor and the editor that is disliked edits a page and the editor that dislikes the person that edits the page, then the person's edits will be reverted even if the edits are good edits. Critics POOOOOOOP LOLOLOLOLOL have charged that this makes Wikipedia an unreliable source OMGIHATE MY TEACHER HE IS STUPID IM GONNA KILL HIM for information after taking a shit.In responding to this, Wikipedia founder ' , and we are working our PEEENISSS shafts to stop potential vandals before they reach the site I LUV TO FUCK MY MOM PENIS!!!!!!!!!!!
So, they discarded the idea of "nupedia" and switched to "wikipedia", which had four letters before the pedia instead of two, and was therefore twice as good an idea.
and there is an expectation that some form of that system will make its way onto the English version at some future point.
Software created by Luca de Alfaro FUCK HIM and colleagues at the University of California, Santa Cruz is now being tested that will assign "trust ratings" to individual Wikipedia contributors, with the intention that eventually only edits made by those who have established themselves ass And of course, people who copy-paste from Wikipedia's articles always get full marks for their assignments.
Wikipedia's name is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a technology for stealing content from other websites, from the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning 'thief') and pedia meaning 'children'; literally stealing content for perverting children's brains.
Wikipedia traces its origins to 2001, when a pair of bored college students, Jimbo Wales and Larry Sanger, decided that the same principles that made things like the graffiti on bathroom stalls great could also be applied to internet encyclopedias.